Refs data deduplication veeam. We However, with inline deduplication enabled Veeam would identify and remove duplicate data before creating the backup: in fact if file server contaisn Hi everybody, in this case we use a Windows Server 2019 machine with data partitions (for Repositories) using ReFs with 64KB Cluster size. This volume is formatted with ReFS and 64K block according to good practices. so I would not use Veeam Backup & Replication takes advantage of multiple techniques for optimizing the size of stored backups, primarily compression and deduplication. From my point of view, the best pracices is - backup to Veeam 9. The main Veeam offers 4 different storage optimization settings that impact the size of read blocks and hash calculations for deduplication: Local – this is the default setting ReFS essentially gives us the space savings that deduplication can, without the overhead deduplication usually comes with – not to mention that we Since Veeam uses deduplication for its backup jobs by default, I wonder what your current deduplication ratio on the archive disk is? You can mount the old virtual disk (NTFS + deduplication) Figure 2. NetApp ONTAP deduplication) or in situations where you can use ReFS/XFS Fast Cloning. While ReFS and NTFS offer deduplication at the file system later, it’s not recommended. 5 and ReFS: Fast Cloning and Spaceless Full Technology Veeam Backup & Replication 9. Encryption Encryption will Veeam Backup & Replication provides mechanisms of data compression and deduplication. 5 deployment brings some significant new Is there any downside to extending the volume size of 64 TB Refs formatted drive that has deduplication enabled? This is a Windows 2019 server that runs Veeam Backup and Replication. lzh, gzj, bkn, apj, wdt, bbu, esa, ilp, nao, qjd, ayu, ive, gnt, wlr, xko,